College admissions with affirmative action (Q2576650): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Changed an Item |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00182-005-0215-7; 10.7916/D8N87NZR / rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-005-0215-7 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2164712528 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00182-005-0215-7 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.7916/D8N87NZR / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:12, 25 September 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | College admissions with affirmative action |
scientific article |
Statements
College admissions with affirmative action (English)
0 references
14 December 2005
0 references
This paper first shows that when colleges' preferences are substitutable there does not exist any stable matching mechanism that makes truthful revelation of preferences a dominant strategy for every student. The paper introduces student types and captures colleges' preferences for affirmative action via type-specific quotas: A college always prefers a set of students that respects its type-specific quotas to another set that violates them. Then it shows that the student-applying deferred acceptance mechanism makes truthful revelation of preferences a dominant strategy for every student if each college's preferences satisfy responsiveness over acceptable sets of students that respect its type-specific quotas. These results have direct policy implications in several entry-level labor markets (Roth 1991). Furthermore, a fairness notion and the related incentive theory developed here is applied to controlled choice in the context of public school choice by Abdulkadiroglu and Sönmez (2003).
0 references
preferences
0 references
acceptance mechanism
0 references