On the verge of \textit{Umdeutung} in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle. I. (Q2460936): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00407-007-0010-x / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Anthony Duncan / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Anthony Duncan / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q56551333 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2951946178 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: physics/0610192 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Understanding Heisenberg’s “magical” paper of July 1925: A new look at the calculational details / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4940743 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quantum Theory of Dispersion / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3997085 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4490830 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3138782 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4692842 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Elektromagnetismus / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5782839 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Application of the Tamm-Dancoff-method to the Lee-model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bohr-Kramers-Slater: A Virtual Theory of Virtual Oscillators and Its Role in the History of Quantum Mechanics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reconsidering a scientific revolution: the case of Einstein versus Lorentz / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4702216 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Simplified Method of Computing the Cohesive Energies of Monovalent Metals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4434444 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5732580 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5480852 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3529045 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5822941 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5761810 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00407-007-0010-X / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 18:54, 18 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the verge of \textit{Umdeutung} in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle. I.
scientific article

    Statements

    On the verge of \textit{Umdeutung} in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the correspondence principle. I. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 November 2007
    0 references
    In October 1924, The Physical Review, a relatively minor journal at the time, published a remarkable two-part paper by John H. Van Vleck, working in virtual isolation at the University of Minnesota. Using Bohr's correspondence principle and Einstein's quantum theory of radiation along with advanced techniques from classical mechanics, Van Vleck showed that quantum formulae for emission, absorption, and dispersion of radiation merge with their classical counterparts in the limit of high quantum numbers. For modern readers Van Vieck's paper is much easier to follow than the famous paper by Kramers and Heisenberg on dispersion theory, which covers similar terrain and is highly credited to have led directly to Heisenberg's \textit{Umdeutung} paper. This makes Van Vleck's paper extremely valuable for the reconstruction of the genesis of matrix mechanics. It also makes it tempting to ask why Van Vleck did not take the next step and develop matrix mechanics himself. After this abstract the authors proceed to the announced reconstruction and they do it ``from a more American vantage point''. The extensive bibliography consists of 206 items. For Part II, see the review Zbl 1129.01009 below.
    0 references
    0 references
    Heisenberg's Umdeutung paper
    0 references
    Bohr's correspondence principle
    0 references

    Identifiers