Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones (Q464829): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Normalize DOI.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s00222-014-0500-9 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S00222-014-0500-9 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:20, 9 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones
scientific article

    Statements

    Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 October 2014
    0 references
    A theorem by \textit{Y. Eliashberg} and \textit{H. Hofer} [Differ. Integral Equ. 7, No. 5--6, 1303--1324 (1994; Zbl 0803.58045)] states that any contact form \(\alpha\) on \(\mathbb R^3\) which equals the standard form outside a compact set and whose Reeb vector field does not have any periodic orbits, is diffeomorphic to the standard one. In terms of the Reeb vector field, this is equivalent to say that if the Reeb vector field of \(\alpha\) has a trapped orbit, then it also has a periodic orbit. H. Hofer conjectured the higher-dimensional analogue of this result, but in this paper the authors disprove that conjecture by an example.
    0 references
    contact manifolds
    0 references
    Reeb vector field
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references