Data-driven robust optimization (Q1702776): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/s10107-017-1125-8 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q85016613 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DBLP publication ID
 
Property / DBLP publication ID: journals/mp/BertsimasGK18 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1007/S10107-017-1125-8 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:55, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Data-driven robust optimization
scientific article

    Statements

    Data-driven robust optimization (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 February 2018
    0 references
    Problems of robust optimization, which are very popular today, involve constraints including both optimization parameters \(x\) and uncertain parameters \(u\). The last ones must belong to a so-called uncertainty set \(U\), whose choice is crucial for the computational performance of the optimization method being applied. If the distribution \(P\) of \(u\) is unknown one should replace \(U\) by \(U_{\epsilon}\) that implies a probabilistic guarantee for \(P\) at level \(\epsilon\). This \(\epsilon\) describes an allowed small violation in \(P\) and corresponding constraints. The authors suppose to shift accents in constructing \(U_{\epsilon}\) from heuristics to statistical analysis of pre-collected data on \(u\). After advancing and testing of the ypothesis about \(P\) on some significance level \(\alpha\) a convex function is built that describes the set of interest. So the obtained \(U_{\epsilon}\) depends not only on \(\epsilon\), but on \(\alpha\), too. The paper deals with uncertain data with different pre-known properties, and depending on these properties different statistical criteria are used to construct an uncertainty set. The authors examine portfolio management and queueing analysis as examples of the implementation of the proposed techniques. The method has shown a good computational efficiency, as the sets obtained are small enough compared with uncertainty sets obtained by other methods.
    0 references
    robust optimization
    0 references
    data-driven optimization
    0 references
    hypothesis testing
    0 references
    uncertainty set
    0 references
    probabilistic guarantee
    0 references
    convex set
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers