Two-block substitutions and morphic words (Q6044318): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2023.102536 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.AAM.2023.102536 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 17:54, 30 December 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7686842
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Two-block substitutions and morphic words |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7686842 |
Statements
Two-block substitutions and morphic words (English)
0 references
17 May 2023
0 references
The most interesting example of a two-block substitution that is not two-block stable is the Oldenburger-Kolakoski two-block substitution. The fact that it is not two-block stable and so its iterates are not defined makes it very hard to establish properties for the corresponding fixed points. In this paper the authors prove that even if a two-block substitution is not two-block stable, it can still be well-behaved, in the sense that its fixed points are pure morphic words. Then they prove that the Thue-Morse word in base 3/2 is not well-behaved: it can not be generated as a coding of a fixed point of a morphism, presenting in parallel a remarkable contrast with the behaviour of the sum of digits function.
0 references
two-block substitutions
0 references
Kolakoski sequence
0 references
morphic words
0 references
base 3/2
0 references