Four relevant Gentzen systems (Q579235): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
This paper is a study of four subscripted Gentzen systems \(G^ uR_+\), \(G^ uT_+\), \(G^ uRW_+\), and \(G^ uTW_+\). \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{A. Urquhart} [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear; Zbl 0611.03005)] show that the first three are equivalent to the semilattice relevant logics of \textit{A. Urquhart} [The Semantics of Eintailment (University of Pittsburgh Doctoral Dissertation, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan) (1973) and J. Symb. Logic 37, 159-169 (1972; Zbl 0245.02028)], and \textit{R. K. Meyer} et al. [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear)] show that the implication conjunction fragement of \(G^ uTW_+\) is equivalent to the corresponding fragment of \({}^ uTW_+\). In this paper Cut Theorems and the admissibility of modus ponens are proved for each system, and decision procedures are provided for the contractionless or contraction-free systems, \(G^ uTW_+\) and \(G^ uRW_+.\) A placeholder is used for the proof of Cut as is usual with relevant Gentzen systems. In this case a structural constant I is used rather than the sentential constant t. The unusual problems raised by t in contractionless relevant logics was noted in \textit{S. Giambrone} [J. Philos. Logic 14, 235-254 (1985; Zbl 0587.03014)] and in \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{R. K. Meyer} [``Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics'', forthcoming]. In these subscripted Gentzen systems special theorems are required for I even in the proof of Cut. In particular, it is shown that all occurrences of I in a derivation can be introduced before any other rules are used. I is also shown to be eliminable as required for the proof of admissibility of modus ponens in the contractionless systems, which proofs are normally trivial (given Cut Theorems) for systems with Contraction. The decidability argument utilizes König's Lemma. The conceptual motivation for the proof of the Finite Branch Property is relevantly similar to that of \textit{S. Giambrone} [loc. cit.]: the existence of finite upper bounds is shown for both the extensional and intensional complexity of consecutions, as ``represented'' by the subscripts in these systems.
Property / review text: This paper is a study of four subscripted Gentzen systems \(G^ uR_+\), \(G^ uT_+\), \(G^ uRW_+\), and \(G^ uTW_+\). \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{A. Urquhart} [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear; Zbl 0611.03005)] show that the first three are equivalent to the semilattice relevant logics of \textit{A. Urquhart} [The Semantics of Eintailment (University of Pittsburgh Doctoral Dissertation, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan) (1973) and J. Symb. Logic 37, 159-169 (1972; Zbl 0245.02028)], and \textit{R. K. Meyer} et al. [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear)] show that the implication conjunction fragement of \(G^ uTW_+\) is equivalent to the corresponding fragment of \({}^ uTW_+\). In this paper Cut Theorems and the admissibility of modus ponens are proved for each system, and decision procedures are provided for the contractionless or contraction-free systems, \(G^ uTW_+\) and \(G^ uRW_+.\) A placeholder is used for the proof of Cut as is usual with relevant Gentzen systems. In this case a structural constant I is used rather than the sentential constant t. The unusual problems raised by t in contractionless relevant logics was noted in \textit{S. Giambrone} [J. Philos. Logic 14, 235-254 (1985; Zbl 0587.03014)] and in \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{R. K. Meyer} [``Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics'', forthcoming]. In these subscripted Gentzen systems special theorems are required for I even in the proof of Cut. In particular, it is shown that all occurrences of I in a derivation can be introduced before any other rules are used. I is also shown to be eliminable as required for the proof of admissibility of modus ponens in the contractionless systems, which proofs are normally trivial (given Cut Theorems) for systems with Contraction. The decidability argument utilizes König's Lemma. The conceptual motivation for the proof of the Finite Branch Property is relevantly similar to that of \textit{S. Giambrone} [loc. cit.]: the existence of finite upper bounds is shown for both the extensional and intensional complexity of consecutions, as ``represented'' by the subscripts in these systems. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B45 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B25 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F07 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F20 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 4014678 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
relevant logics
Property / zbMATH Keywords: relevant logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
proof theory
Property / zbMATH Keywords: proof theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
decision procedures
Property / zbMATH Keywords: decision procedures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
contractionless logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: contractionless logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
contraction-free logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: contraction-free logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
semilattice logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: semilattice logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Gentzen systems
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Gentzen systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
semilattice relevant logics
Property / zbMATH Keywords: semilattice relevant logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Cut Theorems
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Cut Theorems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
structural constant
Property / zbMATH Keywords: structural constant / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
sentential constant
Property / zbMATH Keywords: sentential constant / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3674619 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proof Theories for Semilattice Logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semantics for relevant logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4110432 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An axiomatic version of positive semilattice relevance logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3869324 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Gentzen formulations of two positive relevance logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3728879 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On purported Gentzen formulations of two positive relevant logics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A consecutive calculus for positive relevant implication with necessity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(TW_+\) and \(RW_+\) are decidable / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A contractionless semilattice semantics / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 10:05, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Four relevant Gentzen systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Four relevant Gentzen systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    This paper is a study of four subscripted Gentzen systems \(G^ uR_+\), \(G^ uT_+\), \(G^ uRW_+\), and \(G^ uTW_+\). \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{A. Urquhart} [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear; Zbl 0611.03005)] show that the first three are equivalent to the semilattice relevant logics of \textit{A. Urquhart} [The Semantics of Eintailment (University of Pittsburgh Doctoral Dissertation, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan) (1973) and J. Symb. Logic 37, 159-169 (1972; Zbl 0245.02028)], and \textit{R. K. Meyer} et al. [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. (to appear)] show that the implication conjunction fragement of \(G^ uTW_+\) is equivalent to the corresponding fragment of \({}^ uTW_+\). In this paper Cut Theorems and the admissibility of modus ponens are proved for each system, and decision procedures are provided for the contractionless or contraction-free systems, \(G^ uTW_+\) and \(G^ uRW_+.\) A placeholder is used for the proof of Cut as is usual with relevant Gentzen systems. In this case a structural constant I is used rather than the sentential constant t. The unusual problems raised by t in contractionless relevant logics was noted in \textit{S. Giambrone} [J. Philos. Logic 14, 235-254 (1985; Zbl 0587.03014)] and in \textit{S. Giambrone} and \textit{R. K. Meyer} [``Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics'', forthcoming]. In these subscripted Gentzen systems special theorems are required for I even in the proof of Cut. In particular, it is shown that all occurrences of I in a derivation can be introduced before any other rules are used. I is also shown to be eliminable as required for the proof of admissibility of modus ponens in the contractionless systems, which proofs are normally trivial (given Cut Theorems) for systems with Contraction. The decidability argument utilizes König's Lemma. The conceptual motivation for the proof of the Finite Branch Property is relevantly similar to that of \textit{S. Giambrone} [loc. cit.]: the existence of finite upper bounds is shown for both the extensional and intensional complexity of consecutions, as ``represented'' by the subscripts in these systems.
    0 references
    relevant logics
    0 references
    proof theory
    0 references
    decision procedures
    0 references
    contractionless logic
    0 references
    contraction-free logic
    0 references
    semilattice logic
    0 references
    Gentzen systems
    0 references
    semilattice relevant logics
    0 references
    Cut Theorems
    0 references
    structural constant
    0 references
    sentential constant
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references