The elementary theory of the recursively enumerable degrees is not \(\aleph _ 0\)-categorical (Q802550): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claims |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Manuel Lerman / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Richard A. Shore / rank | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Robert I. Soare / rank | |||
Revision as of 03:35, 10 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The elementary theory of the recursively enumerable degrees is not \(\aleph _ 0\)-categorical |
scientific article |
Statements
The elementary theory of the recursively enumerable degrees is not \(\aleph _ 0\)-categorical (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
By this paper the authors give the negative answer to the question: ''Is Th(\({\mathcal R})\), the elementary theory of the ordering of the recursively enumerable degrees, \(\aleph_ 0\)-categorical?'' For proving this result, the authors first specify a sequence of finite lattices \({\mathcal P}_ n\) (n\(\geq 0)\) generated by three elements, and then show that all these lattices \({\mathcal P}_ n\) can be embedded (as lattices) into \({\mathcal R}\), the partially ordered set of r.e. degrees. Thus, Th(\({\mathcal R})\) has infinitely many distinct 3-types, and from this the above negative answer follows. The proof of the embedding of \({\mathcal P}_ n\) into \({\mathcal R}\) is very delicate.
0 references
partially ordered set of r.e. degrees
0 references