Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (Q1356437): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q123027379, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1707232231678
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Hian Poh Yap / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 07:31, 22 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 1997
    0 references
    A bottleneck in a non-Tait-colourable cubic graph \(G= (V,E)\) is a minimal set \(\mathcal B\) of odd cuts such that, for any \(S\subseteq E\), either \(S\) or \(E\backslash S\) contains at least one member of \(\mathcal B\). F. Holroyd and F. Loupekine conjectured that in any non-Tait-colourable bridgeless cubic graph, the cuts of orders 3 and 5 form a bottleneck. E. Steffen proves that this conjecture is not true for any cyclically 6-edge non-Tait-colourable cubic graph.
    0 references
    Tait colouring
    0 references
    bottleneck
    0 references
    cubic graph
    0 references

    Identifiers