Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (Q1356437): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q123027379, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1707232231678 |
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q1164054 |
||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Hian Poh Yap / rank | |||
Revision as of 07:31, 22 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs |
scientific article |
Statements
Counterexamples to a conjecture about bottlenecks in non-Tait-colourable cubic graphs (English)
0 references
9 June 1997
0 references
A bottleneck in a non-Tait-colourable cubic graph \(G= (V,E)\) is a minimal set \(\mathcal B\) of odd cuts such that, for any \(S\subseteq E\), either \(S\) or \(E\backslash S\) contains at least one member of \(\mathcal B\). F. Holroyd and F. Loupekine conjectured that in any non-Tait-colourable bridgeless cubic graph, the cuts of orders 3 and 5 form a bottleneck. E. Steffen proves that this conjecture is not true for any cyclically 6-edge non-Tait-colourable cubic graph.
0 references
Tait colouring
0 references
bottleneck
0 references
cubic graph
0 references