Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach (Q697929): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2035950711 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 21:20, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach |
scientific article |
Statements
Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach (English)
0 references
18 September 2002
0 references
Two parties bargain over their shares of a pie whose size is determined by one party's, say it 1, investment decision. The main result is that in all long-run outcomes the level of sunk costs is efficient and, under proper conditions, player 1's share of the efficient pie approximates the maximum of (i) the smallest share that induces efficient investment, even if player 1 expects to approximate the available pie from any inefficient investment: (ii) half of the efficient pie.
0 references
sunk coats
0 references
Nash demand game
0 references
evolution
0 references