Power structure and cardinality restrictions for Paretian social choice rules (Q800196): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Nicely Consistent Voting Systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Construction of Outcome Functions Guaranteeing Existence and Pareto Optimality of Nash Equilibria / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3901249 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategic equilibria and decisive set structures for social choice mechanisms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Consistent Voting Systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 14:56, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Power structure and cardinality restrictions for Paretian social choice rules
scientific article

    Statements

    Power structure and cardinality restrictions for Paretian social choice rules (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let f be a multiple-valued Paretian social choice rule for n voters and an outcome set X. The preventing sets for f are shown to form an acyclic majority when \(| X| <n\), a prefilter when \(| X|\geq n\), and a filter when f also satisfies a binary independence condition. These results are then shown to yield inequalities relating \(| X|\), n, and certain preventing sets. In particular, if every coalition of q voters constitutes a preventing set, then \(| X|\leq [n-1/n-q]\). Other inequalities are obtained if strong equilibria are present for every preference profile.
    0 references
    multiple-valued Paretian social choice rule
    0 references
    preventing sets
    0 references
    acyclic majority
    0 references
    prefilter
    0 references
    strong equilibria
    0 references

    Identifiers