Is there a ``Hilbert thesis''? (Q2631647): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-017-9776-2 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2782676325 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 00:36, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Is there a ``Hilbert thesis''? |
scientific article |
Statements
Is there a ``Hilbert thesis''? (English)
0 references
15 May 2019
0 references
The paper is devoted to the so called Hilbert thesis stating that -- as J. Barwise put it -- ``The informal notion of provable used in mathematics is made precise by the formal notion \textit{provable in first-order logic}''. Different variations of this thesis are discussed. The author also considers whether the very name ``Hilbert thesis'' is justified. The thesis is compared with Church's thesis concerning computability. The problem of the possibility of providing arguments towards the considered thesis is discussed.
0 references
David Hilbert
0 references
formal proofs
0 references
Church's thesis
0 references
diagonalization
0 references