Implicit and explicit LQG self-tuning controllers (Q801864): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3574969 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Application of the robust and adaptive pole placement design technique / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3914862 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On self tuning regulators / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Problems of identification and control / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4745712 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The design of<i>s</i>-domain optimal controllers with integral action for output feedback control systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: LQG multivariable controllers : minimum variance interpretation for use in self-tuning systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Multivariate weighted minimum variance self-tuning controllers† / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Identification of processes in closed loop-identifiability and accuracy aspects / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3870741 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Experimental comparison and application of various parameter-adaptive control algorithms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Using the filtered CARMA and CARIMA models for state-space self-tuning control / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5671892 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Predictor-based self-tuning control / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A general transfer function approach to linear stationary filtering and steady-state optimal control problems / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:14, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Implicit and explicit LQG self-tuning controllers
scientific article

    Statements

    Implicit and explicit LQG self-tuning controllers (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Considered is a system where B/A is the plant transfer function, \(c_ n/c_ d\) is a cascade controller, the signals v, \(\xi\) and \(\omega\) are assumed to be stationary, zero mean sequences of uncorrelated random variables which are jointly independent and have the variances R, \(Q_ 2\) and \(Q_ 3\), respectively. The reference r is stochastic and can also represent an extra perturbation signal which enables closed-loop identifiability conditions to be met. This paper derives explicit and implicit LQG self-tuning control laws and proves that the LQG self-tuners have a number of advantages: (a) The controllers are stable for all values of the control weighting parameters when the plant is known, even when the plant is either open-loop unstable or nonminimum phase. (b) Integral action may easily be introduced by appropriate choice of the cost function. (c) Stochastic reference and disturbance inputs to the system are taken into account in the optimal controller design. (d) The time delay does not enter explicitly into the calculation of the controllers and thus the magnitude of the delay need not be known a priori.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    spectral factorization
    0 references
    linear quadratic Gaussian self-tuning controllers
    0 references
    0 references