Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones (Q464829): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q60228720, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711439739529
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1309.4982 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 13:58, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones
scientific article

    Statements

    Trapped Reeb orbits do not imply periodic ones (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 October 2014
    0 references
    A theorem by \textit{Y. Eliashberg} and \textit{H. Hofer} [Differ. Integral Equ. 7, No. 5--6, 1303--1324 (1994; Zbl 0803.58045)] states that any contact form \(\alpha\) on \(\mathbb R^3\) which equals the standard form outside a compact set and whose Reeb vector field does not have any periodic orbits, is diffeomorphic to the standard one. In terms of the Reeb vector field, this is equivalent to say that if the Reeb vector field of \(\alpha\) has a trapped orbit, then it also has a periodic orbit. H. Hofer conjectured the higher-dimensional analogue of this result, but in this paper the authors disprove that conjecture by an example.
    0 references
    contact manifolds
    0 references
    Reeb vector field
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references