A bijection proving the Aztec diamond theorem by combing lattice paths (Q396947): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Aztec diamonds and digraphs, and Hankel determinants of Schröder numbers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Perfect matchings of cellular graphs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Alternating-sign matrices and domino tilings. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A simple proof of the Aztec diamond theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-intersecting paths, random tilings and random matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Markov Chain Algorithms for Planar Lattice Structures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4236280 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Remark on the dimer problem / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:17, 8 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A bijection proving the Aztec diamond theorem by combing lattice paths
scientific article

    Statements

    A bijection proving the Aztec diamond theorem by combing lattice paths (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 August 2014
    0 references
    Summary: We give a bijective proof of the Aztec diamond theorem, stating that there are \(2^{n(n+1)/2}\) domino tilings of the Aztec diamond of order \(n\). The proof in fact establishes a similar result for non-intersecting families of \(n+1\) Schröder paths, with horizontal, diagonal or vertical steps, linking the grid points of two adjacent sides of an \(n\times n\) square grid; these families are well known to be in bijection with tilings of the Aztec diamond. Our bijection is produced by an invertible ``combing'' algorithm, operating on families of paths without non-intersection condition, but instead with the requirement that any vertical steps come at the end of a path, and which are clearly \(2^{n(n+1)/2}\) in number; it transforms them into non-intersecting families.
    0 references
    Aztec diamond
    0 references
    domino tiling
    0 references
    non-intersecting paths
    0 references
    bijective proof
    0 references
    algorithmic bijection
    0 references

    Identifiers