There is no monad based on Hartman-Mycielski functor (Q2452167): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Adjoint functors and triples / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3979616 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the imbedding of topological groups into connected topological groups / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A normal functor based on the Hartman-Mycielski construction / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On topological properties of the Hartman-Mycielski functor / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hartman-Mycielski functor of non-metrizable compacta / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Monads in the category of compacta / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2740463 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4336686 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:10, 8 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
There is no monad based on Hartman-Mycielski functor
scientific article

    Statements

    There is no monad based on Hartman-Mycielski functor (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 May 2014
    0 references
    Given a topological space \(X\) and an admissible metric \(d\) on \(X\) bounded by \(1\), \(HM(X)\) denotes the space of all maps from the half-open interval \([0,1)\) to \(X\) such that \(f|_{[t_i,\,t_{i+1})}\equiv\text{const}\) for some \(0=t_0\leqslant\ldots\leqslant t_n=1\) with respect to the metric \(d_{HM}(f,g)=\int\limits_0^1d(f(t),g(t))dt\) for every \(f,g\in HM(X)\). \(HM(X)\) is known as the Hartman-Mycielski construction~[\textit{S. Hartman} and \textit{J. Mycielski}, Colloq. Math. 5, 167--169 (1958; Zbl 0086.02601)]. This construction was employed in~[\textit{A. Teleiko} and \textit{M. Zarichnyi}, Categorical topology of compact Hausdorff spaces. Mathematical Studies Monograph Series. 5. Lviv: VNTL Publishers. (1999; Zbl 1032.54004)], to get a family \(\mathcal{F}\) of normal functors (in the sense of~[\textit{E. V. Shchepin}, Russ. Math. Surv. 36, No. 3, 1--71 (1981; Zbl 0487.54011)]) on the category \textbf{Comp} of compact Hausdorff spaces (one notices that, in general, the space \(HM(X)\) is not compact). In~[\textit{T. M. Radul}, Mat. Stud. 19, No. 2, 201--207 (2003; Zbl 1023.54017)], one constructed a normal functor \(H\), which contained all the elements of \(\mathcal{F}\) as subfunctors. The present paper shows that the functor \(H\) can not be extended to a monad on \textbf{Comp}. This result follows from Theorem~4.2 on page~125, the proof of which is based in a number of technical lemmas. The paper itself is rather technical in nature and its language is quite concise. It is, however, well written, and will be of interest to categorical topologists.
    0 references
    compact Hausdorff space
    0 references
    Hartman-Mycielski construction
    0 references
    monad
    0 references
    natural transformation
    0 references
    normal functor
    0 references
    (pseudo)metric
    0 references
    uniform space
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references