Cubic \((m,n)\)-metacirculant graphs which are not Cayley graphs (Q1918554): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126666222, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1722284575798
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q126666222 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:26, 29 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Cubic \((m,n)\)-metacirculant graphs which are not Cayley graphs
scientific article

    Statements

    Cubic \((m,n)\)-metacirculant graphs which are not Cayley graphs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    22 August 1996
    0 references
    Let \(G\) be a cubic \((m, n)\)-metacirculant graph. It is proved that \(G\) is not a Cayley graph if and only if \(G\) is the union of disjoint copies of a generalized Petersen graph \(P(d, k)\) with \(d> 2\) and \(k^2\equiv -1\pmod d\).
    0 references
    0 references
    metacirculant graph
    0 references
    Cayley graph
    0 references
    Petersen graph
    0 references
    0 references