What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics? (Q1327483): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Added link to MaRDI item.
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 12:31, 31 January 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics?
scientific article

    Statements

    What is the upper part of the lattice of bimodal logics? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 1995
    0 references
    The paper proves a rather surprising fact for the lattice of normal bimodal logics. Namely, let \(\Lambda_ 1\) be the monomodal logic of a two-element chain, and consider the ``fusion'' \(\Lambda_ 1 \otimes \text{S5}\), which is defined as the extension of the minimal normal bimodal logic by axioms of \(\Lambda_ 1\) for \(\square_ 1\) and axioms of S5 for \(\square_ 2\). For a modal logic \(L\), \({\mathcal E} (L)\) denotes the lattice of normal extensions of \(L\) (in the same language). The main theorem states that \({\mathcal E} (T)\) (\(T\) is the logic of all reflexive Kripke frames) can be embedded into \({\mathcal E} (\Lambda_ 1 \otimes \text{S5}\)). Thus the latter is uncountable, although \({\mathcal E} (\Lambda_ 1)\) is finite and \({\mathcal E} (S5)\) is a \((1+ \omega^*)\)-chain.
    0 references
    fusion
    0 references
    lattice of normal bimodal logics
    0 references
    lattice of normal extensions
    0 references
    Kripke frames
    0 references

    Identifiers