Oscillation criteria for certain second order difference equations (Q686842): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ethiraju Thandapani / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Jerzy Popenda / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 07:57, 14 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Oscillation criteria for certain second order difference equations
scientific article

    Statements

    Oscillation criteria for certain second order difference equations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 October 1993
    0 references
    The author considers second order difference equations of the form \[ \Delta^ 2y_{n-1}+\sum^ m_{i=1}q_{i,n}f_ i(y_ n)g_ i(\Delta y_{n-1})=0,\;n\in \mathbb{N}, \tag{*} \] and gives (in four theorems) sufficient conditions for all solutions of the equation \((*)\) to be oscillatory. In the reviewer's opinion some additional assumptions should be added, generally for the functions \(g_ i\), because it is easy to find equations of the type \((*)\) such that all assumptions are satisfied, nevertheless the equation possesses the nonoscillatory solution \(y_ n \equiv 1\) (on \(\mathbb{N})\), in fact a family of constant solutions. This refers to Lemma 2 and all theorems. Let us take (for Lemma 2) \(m=1\), \(q_{1,n} =n^ 2\), \(g(u)=u^ 2\), \(f(u)=u\). The sequence \(y_ n=1\), \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) is a positive solution of \((*)\) but the thesis \(y_{n+1}>y_ n\) and \(\Delta y_ n>0\) falls down (see also applications of this lemma in the proofs of the theorems). Similar results for the discrete Emden- Fowler equation were obtained by \textit{J. W. Hooker} and \textit{W. T. Patula} [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 91, 9-29 (1983; Zbl 0508.39005)].
    0 references
    0 references
    oscillatory solution
    0 references
    second order difference equations
    0 references