Exact coverings of the integers by arithmetic progressions (Q1074650): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Removed claims |
||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: R. Jamie Simpson / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Q750484 / rank | |||
Revision as of 00:00, 20 February 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Exact coverings of the integers by arithmetic progressions |
scientific article |
Statements
Exact coverings of the integers by arithmetic progressions (English)
0 references
1986
0 references
A system of arithmetic progressions is said to be exactly covering (ECS) if each integer belongs to exactly one progression of that system. An ECS in which every modulus (difference) occurs at most M times is denoted by ECS(M). Main theorem: Let \(p_ 1<...<p_ t\) be the distinct prime divisors of the moduli in an ECS(M), then \(p_ t\leq M\prod^{t-1}_{i=1}p_ i/(p_ i-1).\) This is a generalization of a theorem by N. Burshtein, who proved similar results for a special case of so called natural exactly covering systems. Corollary (4.1). The greatest prime \(p_ t\) dividing the modulus of any arithmetic progression in an ECS(M) is at most equal to the greatest prime \(p^*\) satisfying \(M\prod_{p<p^*}p/(p-1)\geq p^*.\) This represents for the case \(M=2\) the proof of a conjecture by Burshtein: all moduli of an ECS(2) are of the form \(2^ a 3^ b 5^ c 7^ d.\)
0 references
upper and lower bounds on prime divisors of moduli
0 references
upper bound on
0 references
least modulus
0 references
system of arithmetic progressions
0 references
exactly covering systems
0 references