Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace (Q752672): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ubaldo Garibaldi / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Maria Antonietta Penco / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 03:59, 20 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace
scientific article

    Statements

    Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace (English)
    0 references
    1991
    0 references
    This is a study of an anonymous paper ``Calculation of the credibility of human testimony'' (1699) and its comparison with the relevant considerations of J. Bernoulli (with his ``pure'' and ``mixed'' arguments) and Laplace. The authors conclude that the 17th-century notion of degree of certitude measures the correctness of the ``internal state of the witness''. They do not explain the meaning of the adjectives used in the title of their article, while commenting on the contribution of J. Craig (1699) they fail to mention S. Stigler's recent interpretation of his mathematics.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    credibility
    0 references
    posterior probability
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references