Assembly line productivity assessment by comparing optimization-simulation algorithms of trajectory planning for industrial robots (Q1666976): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q59120322, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1706974296281
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1032246
Property / author
 
Property / author: Francisco J. Valero / rank
Normal rank
 

Revision as of 00:28, 22 February 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Assembly line productivity assessment by comparing optimization-simulation algorithms of trajectory planning for industrial robots
scientific article

    Statements

    Assembly line productivity assessment by comparing optimization-simulation algorithms of trajectory planning for industrial robots (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 August 2018
    0 references
    Summary: In this paper an analysis of productivity will be carried out from the resolution of the problem of trajectory planning of industrial robots. The analysis entails economic considerations, thus overcoming some limitations of the existing literature. Two methodologies based on optimization-simulation procedures are compared to calculate the time needed to perform an industrial robot task. The simulation methodology relies on the use of robotics and automation software called GRASP. The optimization methodology developed in this work is based on the kinematics and the dynamics of industrial robots. It allows us to pose a multiobjective optimization problem to assess the trade-offs between the economic variables by means of the Pareto fronts. The comparison is carried out for different examples and from a multidisciplinary point of view, thus, to determine the impact of using each method. Results have shown the opportunity costs of non using the methodology with optimized time trajectories. Furthermore, it allows companies to stay competitive because of the quick adaptation to rapidly changing markets.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references