Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\) (Q621930): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q56970158, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1708039819900
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 00:48, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 January 2011
    0 references
    The authors establish new lower bounds for the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation of points in the plane. Consider a Delaunay triangulation \(T\) of a set \(P\) of points in the plane as a Euclidean graph in which the weight of every edge is its length. The stretch factor of \(T\) is, among all pairs \(p,q\) of points in \(P\), the maximum ratio of the length of the shortest path from \(p\) to \(q\) in \(P\) over the Euclidean distance \(|pq|\). It has long been conjectured that the stretch factor in \(T\) of any pair \(p,p'\in P\), which is the ratio of the length of the shortest path from \(p\) to \(p'\) in \(T\) over the Euclidean distance \(\|pp'\|\), can be at most \(\pi/2\approx1.5708\). In this paper, the authors show how to construct point sets in convex position with stretch factor \(>1.5810\) and in general position with stretch factor \(>1.5846\). Furthermore, it is shown that a sufficiently large set of points drawn independently from any distribution will in the limit approach the worst-case stretch factor for that distribution. The best upper bound known for the stretch factor is \(\frac{2\pi}{3\cos(\frac\pi6)}\approx 2.419\) and was presented by \textit{J. M. Keil} and \textit{C. A. Gutwin} [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 382, 47--56 (1989; Zbl 0766.52004)] whereas for points in convex position it is \(2.33\) [cf., \textit{S. Cui}, \textit{I. A. Kanj} and \textit{G. Xia}, Comput. Geom. 44, No. 2, 104--109 (2011; Zbl 1217.65046)].
    0 references
    0 references
    dilation
    0 references
    spanning ratio
    0 references
    shortest path
    0 references
    point configuration
    0 references
    Delaunay triangulation
    0 references
    Euclidean graph
    0 references
    Euclidean distance
    0 references
    stretch factor
    0 references
    point sets in convex position
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references