There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime (Q2080964): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.5802/crmath.393 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4300978941 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 20:17, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime
scientific article

    Statements

    There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 October 2022
    0 references
    A Sierpinski number is an odd positive integer \(k\) such that \(2^nk+1\) is composite for every positive integer \(n\). A Carmichael number is an odd integer \(N\) such that it is composite but \(a^N\equiv a\pmod{N}\) for every \(a\). This paper relates both concepts by considering the set \[ \mathcal{K}=\{k \text{ odd}: \{2^nk+1\}_{n\geq 0} \text{ contains some Carmichael number}\} \] In particular it is proved that all members of \(\mathcal{K}\) are in fact composite. Note that this is equivalent to saying that there is no Carmichael number of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) an odd prime.
    0 references
    0 references
    Carmichael numbers
    0 references
    Sierpinski numbers
    0 references
    0 references