There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime (Q2080964): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.5802/crmath.393 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4300978941 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 20:17, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime |
scientific article |
Statements
There are no Carmichael numbers of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) prime (English)
0 references
12 October 2022
0 references
A Sierpinski number is an odd positive integer \(k\) such that \(2^nk+1\) is composite for every positive integer \(n\). A Carmichael number is an odd integer \(N\) such that it is composite but \(a^N\equiv a\pmod{N}\) for every \(a\). This paper relates both concepts by considering the set \[ \mathcal{K}=\{k \text{ odd}: \{2^nk+1\}_{n\geq 0} \text{ contains some Carmichael number}\} \] In particular it is proved that all members of \(\mathcal{K}\) are in fact composite. Note that this is equivalent to saying that there is no Carmichael number of the form \(2^np+1\) with \(p\) an odd prime.
0 references
Carmichael numbers
0 references
Sierpinski numbers
0 references