Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach (Q697929): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2035950711 / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 22:20, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach
scientific article

    Statements

    Why sunk costs matter for bargaining outcomes: An evolutionary approach (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    18 September 2002
    0 references
    Two parties bargain over their shares of a pie whose size is determined by one party's, say it 1, investment decision. The main result is that in all long-run outcomes the level of sunk costs is efficient and, under proper conditions, player 1's share of the efficient pie approximates the maximum of (i) the smallest share that induces efficient investment, even if player 1 expects to approximate the available pie from any inefficient investment: (ii) half of the efficient pie.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    sunk coats
    0 references
    Nash demand game
    0 references
    evolution
    0 references
    0 references