An episode in the history of dynamics: Jakob Hermann's proof (1716-1717) of proposition 1, book 1, of Newton's Principia (Q1915876): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1996.0016 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2033595587 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 21:34, 19 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | An episode in the history of dynamics: Jakob Hermann's proof (1716-1717) of proposition 1, book 1, of Newton's Principia |
scientific article |
Statements
An episode in the history of dynamics: Jakob Hermann's proof (1716-1717) of proposition 1, book 1, of Newton's Principia (English)
0 references
21 August 1996
0 references
Newton's Principia hides a puzzle for historians of science. Any person might think that the ``mathematical principles'' to which Newton refers are those of infinitesimal calculus. However in the Principia calculus is used in only a few isolated cases. Newton's geometric proof of Proposition 1 of Book 1 is based on an intuitive theory of limits. In 1716-1717 the Swiss mathematician, Jakob Hermann, gave a proof of Proposition 1 based on infinitesimals. The present paper discusses both Newton's and Hermann's solutions. A comparison of the two gives us an insight into an episode of the process that led from the geometric style of Newton's Principia to the analytic style of Euler's Mechanica (1736).
0 references
Isaac Newton
0 references
Kepler's laws
0 references
central forces
0 references
Jakob Hermann
0 references