EmpiricalCalibration (Q28244): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: source code repository (P339): https://github.com/cran/EmpiricalCalibration, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711027662947 |
Swh import (talk | contribs) SWHID from Software Heritage |
||||||||||||||
| Property / Software Heritage ID | |||||||||||||||
| Property / Software Heritage ID: swh:1:snp:73d19df46ba6f4af02e98950d547ba469405355e / rank | |||||||||||||||
Normal rank | |||||||||||||||
| Property / Software Heritage ID: swh:1:snp:73d19df46ba6f4af02e98950d547ba469405355e / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
| Property / Software Heritage ID: swh:1:snp:73d19df46ba6f4af02e98950d547ba469405355e / qualifier | |||||||||||||||
point in time: 1 January 2024
| |||||||||||||||
Latest revision as of 17:32, 21 March 2024
Routines for Performing Empirical Calibration of Observational Study Estimates
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | EmpiricalCalibration |
Routines for Performing Empirical Calibration of Observational Study Estimates |
Statements
21 December 2023
0 references
Routines for performing empirical calibration of observational study estimates. By using a set of negative control hypotheses we can estimate the empirical null distribution of a particular observational study setup. This empirical null distribution can be used to compute a calibrated p-value, which reflects the probability of observing an estimated effect size when the null hypothesis is true taking both random and systematic error into account. A similar approach can be used to calibrate confidence intervals, using both negative and positive controls. For more details, see Schuemie et al. (2013) <doi:10.1002/sim.5925> and Schuemie et al. (2018) <doi:10.1073/pnas.1708282114>.
0 references
