Simple proof of a criterion for cones in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\) (Q689812): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Krasnosel'skii-type characterizations for a cone / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Intersection formulae for the kernel of a cone / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Determining dimension of the kernel of a cone / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5338702 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:43, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Simple proof of a criterion for cones in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Simple proof of a criterion for cones in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    15 November 1993
    0 references
    A subset \(S\) of \(\mathbb{R}^ d\) is a cone if and only if it is the union of closed halflines with a common endpoint. A point \(x\) in \(S\) is clearly \(R\)-visible via \(S\) from a point \(y\) if and only if there exists a neighbourhood \(N\) of \(x\) such that all closed halflines issuing from \(y\) through all points of \(N\cap S\) lie in \(S\). An alternative short proof of the following earlier criterion for cones is given: If every two local nonconvexity points of a closed connected and nonconvex set \(S\) in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\) are clearly \(R\)-visible via \(S\) from a common point of \(S\), then \(S\) is a cone.
    0 references
    clear \(R\)-visibility
    0 references
    Krasnosel'skij-type criteria
    0 references
    cone
    0 references

    Identifiers