Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options (Q5932336): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A characterization of strategy-proof social choice functions for economies with pure public goods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Maximal domain for strategy-proof rules with one public good / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Straightforward Elections, Unanimity and Phantom Voters / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategy-proofness and ``median voters'' / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The structure of non-manipulable social choice rules on a tree / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Generalized Condorcet-winners for single peaked and single-plateau preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategy-proof location on a network / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The replacement principle in public good economies with single-peaked preferences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Impossibility of Strategy-Proof Mechanisms in Economies with Pure Public Goods / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:57, 3 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1596124
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1596124

    Statements

    Independence axioms for the provision of multiple public goods as options (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    26 August 2003
    0 references
    There are \(m\) identical public goods whose location should be chosen. A feasible set of locations is a closed subinterval of \([0,1]\). Each location is an option, and each agent selects his most preferred option. It is assumed that the preference of an agent is single-peaked. The preference structure is investigated. For the case \(m=2\) it is proved that the extreme peak solution is the only solution satisfying a combination of axioms including Pareto optimality and interval continuity. It is proved also, that for \(m \geq 3\) Pareto-optimality and interval continuity are incompatible.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    public goods
    0 references
    singled peaked preferences
    0 references
    independence of irrelevant alternatives
    0 references
    0 references