Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining (Q1599825): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The simplest equilibrium of a majority-rule division game / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Noncooperative Theory of Coalitional Bargaining / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The role of risk preferences in bargaining when acceptance of a proposal requires less than unanimous approval / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Stochastic Model of Sequential Bargaining with Complete Information / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Efficient delays in a stochastic model of bargaining / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A noncooperative coalitional bargaining game with random proposers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4004282 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 09:26, 4 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining
scientific article

    Statements

    Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2002
    0 references
    The authors consider multilateral stochastic bargaining models with general agreement rules. For \(n\)-player games where in each period a player is randomly selected to allocate a stochastic level of surplus, and \(q\leq n\) players have to agree on a proposal to induce its acceptance they characterize the set of stationary subgame perfect equilibrium payoffs and establish their existence. They show that for agreement rule other than the unanimity rule, the equilibrium payoffs need not to be unique. Also even when the equilibrium is unique, it needs not to be efficient.
    0 references
    non-cooperative
    0 references
    bargaining
    0 references
    voting rules
    0 references
    stochastic game
    0 references

    Identifiers