The undecidability of iterated modal relativization (Q2574887): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Logics for epistemic programs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Logic of Public Announcements, Common Knowledge, and Private Suspicions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The undecidability of the domino problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5691140 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Automata, Languages and Programming / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Orderings for term-rewriting systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Reasoning about information change / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3313253 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The decision problems about the periodic solutions of the domino problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On nonmonotone inductive definability / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Logics of public communications / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5494230 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:35, 11 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The undecidability of iterated modal relativization
scientific article

    Statements

    The undecidability of iterated modal relativization (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 December 2005
    0 references
    The operation of iterated relativization appears in dynamic epistemic logic. This operation is motivated by the notion of an epistemic program: an algorithm whose steps use and change the epistemic states of agents. The presented paper deals also with the transitive closure operation, due to its connection to common knowledge. It is shown that, for three fragments of the logic of iterated relativization and transitive closure, the satisfiability problems are \(\Sigma^1_1\)-complete. Two of these fragments do not include transitive closure. It is also shown that the question of whether a sentence in these fragments has a finite (tree) model is \(\Sigma^0_1\)-complete.
    0 references
    dynamic epistemic logic
    0 references
    iterated relativization
    0 references
    modal logic
    0 references
    undecidability
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers