An equivalence theorem for a bargaining set (Q1123107): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q56936208, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1712190744730
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Markets with a Continuum of Traders / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5341355 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Economies with a Finite Set of Equilibria / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4121644 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An advantage of the bargaining set over the core / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The kernel and bargaining set for convex games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5545175 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Oligopoly in Markets with a Continuum of Traders / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3843228 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:59, 20 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
An equivalence theorem for a bargaining set
scientific article

    Statements

    An equivalence theorem for a bargaining set (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    The author proposes a redefinition of the bargaining set concept as a solution concept for economies. Generally speaking, an allocation is said to belong to the bargaining set if for any objection against the allocation there exists a counterobjection to the objection. A so-called Walrasian allocation necessarily belongs to the bargaining set because there can be no objection to the Walrasian allocation. The aim of the paper is to show that the converse is also true with respect to the proposed modification of the bargaining set. To be exact, under certain standard conditions it is established that the modified bargaining set coincides with the set of Walrasian allocations. The standard conditions under which the equivalence theorem holds require strict monotonicity of preferences, strictly positive endowments and complete, transitive preferences.
    0 references
    0 references
    bargaining set
    0 references
    Walrasian allocation
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references