Communication between rational agents (Q922304): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rationalizable Strategic Behavior / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Signaling Games and Stable Equilibria / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Strategic Information Transmission / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Communication, coordination and Nash equilibrium / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Meaning and credibility in cheap-talk games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sequential Equilibria / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Credible negotiation statements and coherent plans / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 11:40, 21 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Communication between rational agents
scientific article

    Statements

    Communication between rational agents (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    The paper deals with the study of credible communication in simple communication games. As a matter of fact, the author introduces a new solution concept which does guarantee communication in some games. The solution concept in question is called Credible Message Rationalizability and combines the assumptions of rich language and rationality of agents. That is, the author assumes both full rationality without imposing equilibrium conditions and the natural behaviour of agents about the use of language: agents have a propensity to speak the truth and to believe others speak the truth, but use the game's strategic incentives to check whether such behavior and beliefs are rational. The author also introduces an equilibrium version of the concept developed and proves the existence of the so-called Credible Message Equilibrium for simple communicaton games. The theory developed is illustrated by several examples.
    0 references
    0 references
    credible communication
    0 references
    simple communication games
    0 references
    Credible Message Rationalizability
    0 references