On distinct distances and \(\lambda \)-free point sets (Q998391): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4328181 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Sets of Distances of n Points / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3997075 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3856819 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Integer Sets Containing No Arithmetic Progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4657584 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4455112 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Isosceles triangles determined by a planar point set / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Arithmetical progressions and the number of sums / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Distinct distances in the plane / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Integer sets containing no arithmetic progressions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On distinct sums and distinct distances. / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:07, 29 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On distinct distances and \(\lambda \)-free point sets
scientific article

    Statements

    On distinct distances and \(\lambda \)-free point sets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    28 January 2009
    0 references
    In 1946 Erdős raised the following famous problem: What is the minimum number of distinct distances determined by \(n\) points in the plane? Denoting this number by \(g(n)\), he conjectured that \(g(n)=\Omega(n/\sqrt{\log n})\) and showed that this bound is attained by the \(\sqrt n \times \sqrt n\) integer grid. Considering the restriction of this problem for \(n\) points on the line, clearly they determine at least \(n-1\) distinct distances; this bound is tight, since \(n\) equidistant points determine only \(n-1\) distances, but the above construction has a very regular grid-like structure, so it is a natural question to ask what happens if we perturb the regularity of the grid, say by not allowing two points together with their midpoint to be in the set? In order to answer this question, the author introduces the following notion: let \(\lambda \in (0,1)\) be a fixed rational number; a set of points \(P\) in the plane is \(\lambda\)-free if for any triple of distinct points \(a, b, c\in P\) \(\lambda a+(1-\lambda)b\neq c\). The main result in the paper is the following estimate on the minimum number of distinct distances in a \(\lambda\)-free point set on the line: Let \(g_{\lambda}(n)\) denote the minimum number of distinct distances determined by a \(\lambda\)-free set of \(n\) points on the line. Then \(g_{\lambda}(n)\) satisfies: \[ \lim_{n\to \infty} \frac{g_{\lambda}(n)}{n} = \infty \] and \[ g_{\lambda}(n)\leq n2^{c_{\lambda}\sqrt{\log n}} \] for a suitable constant \(c_{\lambda}\). Furthermore, in particular \(g_{1/2}(n)\geq c_1n(\log n)^{c_2}\) for some absolute constants \(c_1, c_2 >0\). Other related distance problems are also discussed in the paper, including possible implications of obtaining good estimates on the minimum number of distinct distances in a \(\lambda\)-free point set in the plane for the general problem of distinct distances in the plane.
    0 references
    distinct distances
    0 references
    midpoint-free sets
    0 references
    \(\lambda \)-triples
    0 references
    set arithmetic
    0 references

    Identifiers