Existence of solutions for higher order BVP with parameters via critical point theory (Q2340243): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Singular Lidstone boundary value problem with given maximal values for solutions. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4208848 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On solutions of a fourth-order Lidstone boundary value problem at resonance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Existence result for the Lidstone boundary value problem at resonance / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Infinitely many solutions for $2k$-th order BVP with parameters / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Positive solutions of fourth-order boundary value problems with two parameters / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Variational Methods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On 2\(n\)th-order Lidstone boundary value problems / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 23:45, 9 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Existence of solutions for higher order BVP with parameters via critical point theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Existence of solutions for higher order BVP with parameters via critical point theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 April 2015
    0 references
    The authors consider the boundary value problem depending on real parameters, \[ (-1)^k x^{(2k)}+\sum\limits_{j=1}^k \lambda_j x^{(2k-2j)} = (-1)^{i-1} f(t,x^{(2i-2)}),\atop{x^{(2j)}(0)=x^{(2j)}(1)=0,\quad j=0,\ldots, k-1,}\eqno{(1)} \] where \(f : [0, 1]\to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function, \(i\) is a fixed integer \(1\leq i \leq k\). Let \[ \Lambda(x)= \sum\limits_{j=1}^k (-1)^{k-j}\lambda_j (x^2\pi^2)^{k-j}, \quad\Delta_+=\bigcap_{n\in N}\{\lambda\in R^k \, | \,\Lambda(n)\geq 0\}\,. \eqno{(2)} \] The main result is formulated for the nonresonant case. {Theorem 4.} Assume that \((\lambda_1,\ldots, \lambda_k)\in \Delta_+\) and let \(f : [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\) be a continuous function that satisfies the following conditions (i) \(\displaystyle\limsup_{u\to 0}\frac{f(t,u)}{u} <\frac{\pi^{2k}+\Lambda(1)}{\pi^{2i-2}}\), \(\displaystyle\liminf_{u\to +\infty}\frac{f(t,u)}{u} >\frac{\pi^{2k}+\Lambda(1)}{\pi^{2i-2}},\) (ii) there exist \(m\in[0,1/2)\) and \(N>0\) such that for \(|w|\geq N\), we have \[ \int_0^w f(t,u)\, du\leq m w f(t,w) \] for each \(t\in [0,1]\). Then problem (1) possesses at least one nonzero solution. To prove this result, the authors use the Mountain Pass Lemma.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    multidimensional spectrum
    0 references
    Lidstone BVP
    0 references
    critical point theory
    0 references
    Palais-Smale condition
    0 references
    0 references