The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games (Q2344949): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 01:59, 10 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games |
scientific article |
Statements
The role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic games (English)
0 references
19 May 2015
0 references
Summary: It is well-known that in finite strategic games true common belief (or common knowledge) of rationality implies that the players will choose only strategies that survive the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies. We establish a general theorem that deals with monotonic rationality notions and arbitrary strategic games and allows to strengthen the above result to arbitrary games, other rationality notions, and transfinite iterations of the elimination process. We also clarify what conclusions one can draw for the customary dominance notions that are not monotonic. The main tool is Tarski's fixpoint theorem.
0 references
true common beliefs
0 references
arbitrary games
0 references
monotonicity
0 references
Tarski's fixpoint theorem
0 references
0 references