The lexicographically ordered square is not monotonically star-finite (Q2401747): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The monotone Lindelöf property and separability in ordered spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3994935 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4768329 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A new extension of countable compactness / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A characterization of monotonically Lindelöf generalized ordered spaces / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5636033 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Classes defined by stars and neighbourhood assignments / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Monotone properties defined from stars of open coverings / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:13, 14 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The lexicographically ordered square is not monotonically star-finite |
scientific article |
Statements
The lexicographically ordered square is not monotonically star-finite (English)
0 references
4 September 2017
0 references
The main result of the authors states that the lexicographically ordered square \([0,1]\times [0,1]\) is not monotonically star-finite. This result answers several questions asked by \textit{S. G. Popvassilev} and \textit{J. E. Porter} [Topology Appl. 169, 87--98 (2014; Zbl 1376.54025)]. Recall that a topological space \(X\) is monotonically star-finite if for any open cover \({\mathcal U}\) of \(X\) there exists a finite subset \(F({\mathcal U})\) of \(X\) such that \(X=\text{st}(F({\mathcal U}),{\mathcal U}),\) and if \({\mathcal V}\) and \({\mathcal U}\) are open covers of \(X\) with \({\mathcal V}\) refining \({\mathcal U},\) then \(F({\mathcal U})\subseteq F({\mathcal V})\), where \(\text{st}(F({\mathcal U}),{\mathcal U})= \bigcup\{U\in {\mathcal U}:U\cap F({\mathcal U})\not =\emptyset\}.\) Monotone star-finiteness is a condition stronger than countable compactness in Hausdorff spaces.
0 references
monotonically star-finite
0 references
compact
0 references
countably compact
0 references
LOTS
0 references
lexicographically ordered square
0 references