On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II (Q1292810): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-365x(99)90035-3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4246286933 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:40, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II
scientific article

    Statements

    On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II (English)
    0 references
    25 January 2000
    0 references
    A graph \(G\) is said to be \(E(m,n)\) if for every pair of disjoint matchings \(M,N\subseteq E(G)\) of size \(m\) and \(n\), respectively, there is a perfect matching \(F\) in \(G\) such that \(M\subseteq F\) and \(F\cap N=\varnothing\). The paper studies conditions under which the implication \(E(m,n)\to E(p,q)\) does or does not hold. It extends the previous results on claw-free graphs and bipartite graphs.
    0 references
    0 references
    perfect matching
    0 references
    claw-free graphs
    0 references
    bipartite graphs
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers