On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II (Q1292810): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-365x(99)90035-3 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4246286933 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:40, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II |
scientific article |
Statements
On matching extensions with prescribed and proscribed edge sets. II (English)
0 references
25 January 2000
0 references
A graph \(G\) is said to be \(E(m,n)\) if for every pair of disjoint matchings \(M,N\subseteq E(G)\) of size \(m\) and \(n\), respectively, there is a perfect matching \(F\) in \(G\) such that \(M\subseteq F\) and \(F\cap N=\varnothing\). The paper studies conditions under which the implication \(E(m,n)\to E(p,q)\) does or does not hold. It extends the previous results on claw-free graphs and bipartite graphs.
0 references
perfect matching
0 references
claw-free graphs
0 references
bipartite graphs
0 references