Correspondence as an intertheory relation (Q798642): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01063853 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1999771211 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:15, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Correspondence as an intertheory relation
scientific article

    Statements

    Correspondence as an intertheory relation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1983
    0 references
    In the early stages of quantum mechanics, a widely accepted heuristic principle played a very important role. It says that a future theory has to be a generalization of a classical theory in the sense of yielding it as a special, or 'limiting', case. This principle, the so-called Correspondence Principle, is especially associated with Niels Bohr. Although it was originally stated for quantum mechanics, an analogous heuristic principle has also been important in the development of other branches of modern physics. Thus it is known, for instance, that Einstein used such a guide in the search for relativity theory. In this paper, we give the gist of our reconstructed notion of (limiting case) correspondence. Our notion is very general, and it should be applicable to all the cases in which a correspondence has been said to exist in actual science. We have elsewhere applied it to a couple of actual cases in physics.
    0 references
    formal metascience
    0 references
    philosophy of science
    0 references
    intertheory relation
    0 references
    Correspondence Principle
    0 references

    Identifiers