When weak and local measure convergence implies norm convergence (Q2633362): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q128580682, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1728347902604
 
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q128580682 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 03:20, 8 October 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
When weak and local measure convergence implies norm convergence
scientific article

    Statements

    When weak and local measure convergence implies norm convergence (English)
    0 references
    8 May 2019
    0 references
    The paper addresses generalizations of the basic fact that, in \(L^1[0,1]\), a sequence converges in norm if (and only if) it converges simultaneously in the weak and in the measure topology. If the underlying measure \(\mu\) is only \(\sigma\)-finite, then the statement remains valid if convergence in measure is replaced by local measure convergence (i.e., convergence in measure on every set of finite measure). The setting for the generalizations is as follows. Let \(\mathcal{M}\) be a von Neumann algebra equipped with a faithful normal semifinite trace \(\tau\) and consider \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\), the set of \(\tau\)-measurable operators affiliated with \(\mathcal{M}\). (If \(\mathcal{M}=L^\infty(\mu)\), then \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) consists of all measurable functions which are bounded except on a set of finite measure.) On \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\), the (by now classical) complete metrizable measure topology \(t_\tau\) is considered: a sequence \((X_n)\) of \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) converges in measure to \(0\) if \(\tau(\chi_{]\varepsilon,\infty[}(|X_n|))\to0\) for every \(\varepsilon>0\). Also, there is the weaker topology of local convergence in measure on \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) which is defined naturally such that it corresponds to convergence in measure on sets of finite measure in the case \(\mathcal{M}=L^\infty(\mu)\). Elements \(X\) of \(\mathcal{M}\) with range projection of finite trace are said to be of \(\tau\)-finite range, their closure \(S_0(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) in \(S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) with respect to the measure topology forms the \(\tau\)-compact operators. In this setting, the authors consider the sets \(I_B=\{A\in S(\mathcal{M},\tau): A=A^*$, $-B\le A\le B\}\) and \(K_B=\{A\in S(\mathcal{M},\tau): A^*A\le B\}\) for positive \(B\in S(\mathcal{M},\tau)\). They show that both \(I_B\) and \(K_B\) are convex and closed in measure and can be written in the form \(I_B=\{\sqrt{B}T\sqrt{B}: T\in\mathcal{M},\,T=T^*, \,\|T\|_\infty\leq1\}\) and \(K_B=\{T\sqrt{B}: T\in\mathcal{M},\, \|T\|_\infty\leq1\}\). The authors show that, if \(\mathcal{M}\) is atomic, then \(I_B\) is \(t_\tau\)-compact if and only if \(B\) is and that this characterizes atomic von Neumann algebras \((\mathcal{M},\tau)\); under a mild additional hypothesis, a Krein-Milman theorem with respect to \(t_\tau\) holds for \(I_B\). If \(I_B\) is considered in certain symmetrically normed operator spaces \(E(\mathcal{M},\tau)\) (which include the predual \(S_1(H)\) of \(B(H)\)), then a sequence in \(I_B\), converging locally in measure, converges in norm. To put this in perspective, note that, as the authors point out, in general in \(S_1(H))\), a sequence converging weakly and locally in measure need not converge in norm, contrary to what happens in the commutative case.
    0 references
    non-commutative integration
    0 references
    measurable operator
    0 references
    measure topology
    0 references
    operator inequality
    0 references
    convergence locally in measure
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers