Reconstructing the topology on monoids and polymorphism clones of the rationals (Q519852): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
Property / review text | |||
Let \(M\) and \(E\) be the endomorphism monoids of the rationals under strict and reflexive order, respectively, and let \(T\) be the full transformation monoid on some countable set, all of them endowed with the natural topology. It comes as no surprise that any isomorphism between \(M\) or \(E\) and a closed submonoid of \(T\) is a homeomorphism. \textit{Mutatis mutandis}, this property of \(M\) and \(E\) called ``automatic homeomorphicity'' also holds for the polymorphism clone on the rationals under the reflexive order, as well as for the clones generated by \(M\) and \(E\). The present theorems improve on related results of \textit{C. Pech} and \textit{M. Pech} [Monatsh. Math. 179, No. 1, 129--148 (2016; Zbl 1419.54040)] and draw heavily on work of \textit{M. Bodirsky} et al. [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369, No. 5, 3707--3740 (2017; Zbl 1377.03021)]. | |||
Property / review text: Let \(M\) and \(E\) be the endomorphism monoids of the rationals under strict and reflexive order, respectively, and let \(T\) be the full transformation monoid on some countable set, all of them endowed with the natural topology. It comes as no surprise that any isomorphism between \(M\) or \(E\) and a closed submonoid of \(T\) is a homeomorphism. \textit{Mutatis mutandis}, this property of \(M\) and \(E\) called ``automatic homeomorphicity'' also holds for the polymorphism clone on the rationals under the reflexive order, as well as for the clones generated by \(M\) and \(E\). The present theorems improve on related results of \textit{C. Pech} and \textit{M. Pech} [Monatsh. Math. 179, No. 1, 129--148 (2016; Zbl 1419.54040)] and draw heavily on work of \textit{M. Bodirsky} et al. [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369, No. 5, 3707--3740 (2017; Zbl 1377.03021)]. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Manfred Armbrust / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 08A35 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 08A40 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6702463 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
rationals | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: rationals / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
endomorphism monoid | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: endomorphism monoid / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
polymorphism | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: polymorphism / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
clone | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: clone / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
automatic homeomorphicity | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: automatic homeomorphicity / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 05:04, 1 July 2023
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Reconstructing the topology on monoids and polymorphism clones of the rationals |
scientific article |
Statements
Reconstructing the topology on monoids and polymorphism clones of the rationals (English)
0 references
7 April 2017
0 references
Let \(M\) and \(E\) be the endomorphism monoids of the rationals under strict and reflexive order, respectively, and let \(T\) be the full transformation monoid on some countable set, all of them endowed with the natural topology. It comes as no surprise that any isomorphism between \(M\) or \(E\) and a closed submonoid of \(T\) is a homeomorphism. \textit{Mutatis mutandis}, this property of \(M\) and \(E\) called ``automatic homeomorphicity'' also holds for the polymorphism clone on the rationals under the reflexive order, as well as for the clones generated by \(M\) and \(E\). The present theorems improve on related results of \textit{C. Pech} and \textit{M. Pech} [Monatsh. Math. 179, No. 1, 129--148 (2016; Zbl 1419.54040)] and draw heavily on work of \textit{M. Bodirsky} et al. [Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 369, No. 5, 3707--3740 (2017; Zbl 1377.03021)].
0 references
rationals
0 references
endomorphism monoid
0 references
polymorphism
0 references
clone
0 references
automatic homeomorphicity
0 references