Normalization and excluded middle. I (Q583185): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Property / review text
 
The rule \[ \supset K:\quad \Gamma,\quad \neg A\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A \] is precisely strong enough to give classical logic from intuitionistic logic, and thus it is exactly equivalent to the law of the excluded middle. This rule is a special case of the rule: \[ \neg D:\quad \Gamma,\quad A\supset B\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A. \] The main result of the paper is to prove the normalization theorem for deductions in the propositional logics and first order predicate logics obtained from intuitionistic logic or minimal logic by adding one of these rules. Every deduction in these logics is shown to be reducible by complete \(\supset K\)-reductions to a \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction with the same undischarged assumptions and the same conclusion; and then, any \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction can be normalized by the methods used for intuitionistically based logic since each \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction has at most one inference by the rule \(\supset K\) and that, if it occurs, is at the end of the deduction.
Property / review text: The rule \[ \supset K:\quad \Gamma,\quad \neg A\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A \] is precisely strong enough to give classical logic from intuitionistic logic, and thus it is exactly equivalent to the law of the excluded middle. This rule is a special case of the rule: \[ \neg D:\quad \Gamma,\quad A\supset B\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A. \] The main result of the paper is to prove the normalization theorem for deductions in the propositional logics and first order predicate logics obtained from intuitionistic logic or minimal logic by adding one of these rules. Every deduction in these logics is shown to be reducible by complete \(\supset K\)-reductions to a \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction with the same undischarged assumptions and the same conclusion; and then, any \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction can be normalized by the methods used for intuitionistically based logic since each \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction has at most one inference by the rule \(\supset K\) and that, if it occurs, is at the end of the deduction. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B20 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03F05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B05 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 03B10 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 4132123 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
classical logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: classical logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
intuitionistic logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: intuitionistic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
law of the excluded middle
Property / zbMATH Keywords: law of the excluded middle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
normalization
Property / zbMATH Keywords: normalization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
minimal logic
Property / zbMATH Keywords: minimal logic / rank
 
Normal rank

Revision as of 19:17, 1 July 2023

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Normalization and excluded middle. I
scientific article

    Statements

    Normalization and excluded middle. I (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    The rule \[ \supset K:\quad \Gamma,\quad \neg A\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A \] is precisely strong enough to give classical logic from intuitionistic logic, and thus it is exactly equivalent to the law of the excluded middle. This rule is a special case of the rule: \[ \neg D:\quad \Gamma,\quad A\supset B\vdash A\quad \to \quad \Gamma \vdash A. \] The main result of the paper is to prove the normalization theorem for deductions in the propositional logics and first order predicate logics obtained from intuitionistic logic or minimal logic by adding one of these rules. Every deduction in these logics is shown to be reducible by complete \(\supset K\)-reductions to a \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction with the same undischarged assumptions and the same conclusion; and then, any \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction can be normalized by the methods used for intuitionistically based logic since each \(\supset K\)-reduced deduction has at most one inference by the rule \(\supset K\) and that, if it occurs, is at the end of the deduction.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    classical logic
    0 references
    intuitionistic logic
    0 references
    law of the excluded middle
    0 references
    normalization
    0 references
    minimal logic
    0 references