A rule is not a rule if it changes from case to case (A reply to Marshall's comment)

DOI10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.011zbMath1331.92115OpenAlexW1970767658MaRDI QIDQ5963472

Matthijs van Veelen

Publication date: 22 February 2016

Published in: Journal of Theoretical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.011

zbMATH Keywords

inclusive fitnessgeneralized equal gains from switchinggroup selectionHamilton's ruleQueller's rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problems related to evolution (92D15) (n)-person games, (n>2) (91A06) Population dynamics (general) (92D25)

Related Items (8)

Understanding microbial cooperation ⋮ A generalization of Hamilton's rule -- love others how much? ⋮ Group selection and inclusive fitness are \textit{not} equivalent; the price equation vs. models and statistics ⋮ Continuous-time models of group selection, and the dynamical insufficiency of kin selection models ⋮ Hamilton's rule ⋮ The replicator dynamics with \(n\) players and population structure ⋮ Multi-player games on the cycle ⋮ A simple model of group selection that cannot be analyzed with inclusive fitness

Cites Work

• Group selection, kin selection, altruism and cooperation: when inclusive fitness is right and when it can be wrong
• On the use of the Price equation
• Hamilton's missing link
• Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
• Queller's rule ok: Comment on van Veelen ``When inclusive fitness is right and when it can be wrong

This page was built for publication: A rule is not a rule if it changes from case to case (A reply to Marshall's comment)