An invariant of topologically ordered states under local unitary transformations

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 01:39, 30 January 2024 by Import240129110155 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110155)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision β†’ (diff)

Publication:261614

DOI10.1007/S00220-016-2594-YzbMATH Open1338.81049arXiv1407.2926OpenAlexW821377971MaRDI QIDQ261614FDOQ261614

Jeongwan Haah

Publication date: 24 March 2016

Published in: Communications in Mathematical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: For an anyon model in two spatial dimensions described by a modular tensor category, the topological S-matrix encodes the mutual braiding statistics, the quantum dimensions, and the fusion rules of anyons. It is nontrivial whether one can compute the S-matrix from a single ground state wave function. Here, we define a class of Hamiltonians consisting of local commuting projectors and an associated matrix that is invariant under local unitary transformations. We argue that the invariant is equivalent to the topological S-matrix. The definition does not require degeneracy of the ground state. We prove that the invariant depends on the state only, in the sense that it can be computed by any Hamiltonian in the class of which the state is a ground state. As a corollary, we prove that any local quantum circuit that connects two ground states of quantum double models (discrete gauge theories) with non-isomorphic abelian groups, must have depth that is at least linear in the system's diameter. As a tool for the proof, a manifestly Hamiltonian-independent notion of locally invisible operators is introduced. This gives a sufficient condition for a many-body state not to be generated from a product state by any small depth quantum circuit; this is a many-body entanglement witness.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2926





Cites Work


Cited In (19)


Recommendations





This page was built for publication: An invariant of topologically ordered states under local unitary transformations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q261614)