Choosing the two finalists

DOI10.1007/S00199-009-0516-3zbMath1205.91051OpenAlexW2130677673MaRDI QIDQ623450

Michael Richter, Kfir Eliaz, Ariel Rubinstein

Publication date: 14 February 2011

Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3

zbMATH Keywords

axiomatizationchoice correspondenceconsideration setstwo-stage choice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (18)

When more is less: limited consideration ⋮ Dual random utility maximisation ⋮ Partial knowledge restrictions on the two-stage threshold model of choice ⋮ Partially dominant choice ⋮ Minimal rationalizations ⋮ Order-\(k\) rationality ⋮ Limited consideration model with a trigger or a capacity ⋮ Behavioral strong implementation ⋮ (F)Lexicographic shortlist method ⋮ Choosing two finalists and the winner ⋮ A new knockout tournament seeding method and its axiomatic justification ⋮ Shortlisting procedure with a limited capacity ⋮ A simple characterization of responsive choice ⋮ On Capacity-Filling and Substitutable Choice Rules ⋮ The attraction effect and its explanations ⋮ Additive representation under idempotent attention ⋮ Description of closure operators in convex geometries of segments on the line ⋮ Cluster-shortlisted choice

Cites Work

• Consumer choice and revealed bounded rationality
• On the testable implications of collective choice theories
• Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing
• A Representation Theorem for "Preference for Flexibility"
• General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects

This page was built for publication: Choosing the two finalists