On the testable implications of collective choice theories

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1587639

DOI10.1006/jeth.2000.2657zbMath0976.91014OpenAlexW1973871892MaRDI QIDQ1587639

Yves Sprumont

Publication date: 3 December 2000

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2657




Related Items (28)

Rationalizability of choice functions by game treesDo voters vote ideologically?Paretian quasi-orders: the regular two-agent caseIdentification of payoffs in repeated gamesNote on unique Nash equilibrium in continuous gamesObservable implications of Nash and subgame-perfect behavior in extensive gamesNonparametric utility theory in strategic settings: revealing preferences and beliefs from proposal-response gamesEmpirical content of classic assignment methods: jungle and market economyEfficient and non-deteriorating choice.Choosing the two finalistsBackwards-induction rationalizability of choice functions over an arbitrary setThe computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behaviorThe testable implications of zero-sum gamesOn refutability of the Nash bargaining solutionLearnability and rationality of choice.Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: Testable restrictions and identification.A nonparametric analysis of multi-product oligopoliesThe computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behaviorA utility representation theorem for general revealed preferenceRevealed preferences of individual players in sequential gamesInterdependent preferences and strategic distinguishabilityGame theory via revealed preferencesImplications of Pareto efficiency for two-agent (household) choiceEvery random choice rule is backwards-induction rationalizableNash rationalization of collective choice over lotteriesDescriptive complexity and revealed preference theorySequential rationalization of multivalued choiceEvery choice correspondence is backwards-induction rationalizable



Cites Work




This page was built for publication: On the testable implications of collective choice theories