Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice Commission's recommendation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:900249
DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.06.001zbMath1331.91064OpenAlexW3121427711MaRDI QIDQ900249
Péter Biró, László Á. Kóczy, Balázs R. Sziklai
Publication date: 22 December 2015
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://real.mtak.hu/26931/7/Bir%C3%B3-K%C3%B3czy-Sziklai_Fair%20apportionment...MSS.pdf
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- European apportionment via the Cambridge compromise
- Evaluating competing criteria for allocating parliamentary seats
- Why not proportional?
- A power-weighted variant of the EU27 Cambridge compromise
- On party-proportional representation under district distortions
- Measuring legislative boundaries
- Proportional optimization and fairness
- Proportional Representation
- Parametric maximum flow methods for minimax approximation of target quotas in biproportional apportionment
- The Quota Method of Apportionment
- Minimax Multi-District Apportionments
- The Hamilton Apportionment Method Is Between the Adams Method and the Jefferson Method
This page was built for publication: Fair apportionment in the view of the Venice Commission's recommendation