Galois number fields with small root discriminant (Q1005555)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 20:57, 30 January 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Added link to MaRDI item.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Galois number fields with small root discriminant
scientific article

    Statements

    Galois number fields with small root discriminant (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 March 2009
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be a Galois extension of \({\mathbb Q}\) with (finite) group \(G\). For \(x\in K\), one has \(\sum_{g\in G} g(x)\in {\mathbb Q}\), and so there exists a map \(\text{tr}: K\rightarrow {\mathbb Q}\) defined by the rule \(x\mapsto\sum_{g\in G} g(x)\). This is the trace map of \(K/{\mathbb Q}\). There is a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form \(B: K\times K\rightarrow {\mathbb Q}\) defined as \(B(x,y)=\text{tr}(xy)\) for \(x,y\in K\). Let \(R\) be the integral closure of \({\mathbb Z}\) in \(K\). Then \(B: R\times R\rightarrow {\mathbb Z}\). Since \(R\) is a finitely generated torsion-free module over the PID \({\mathbb Z}\), \(R\) is \({\mathbb Z}\)-free of rank \(N=| G|\). Let \(\{x_1,x_2,\dots,x_N\}\) denote a \({\mathbb Z}\)-basis for \(R\). Let \(A\) be the \(N\times N\) matrix whose \(i,j\)th entry is \(B(x_i,x_j)=\text{tr}(x_ix_j)\), \(1\leq i,j\leq N\). Then the discriminant of \(K\), \(D(K)\), is the ideal of \({\mathbb Z}\) generated by the non-zero integer \(\text{det}(A)\). We identify \(D(K)\) with the integer \(\text{det}(A)\). Certainly, \(D({\mathbb Q})=1\), and by Minkowski's Theorem, \(| D(K)| > 1\) whenever \(K\not = {\mathbb Q}\). The root discriminant of \(K\) is defined as \(d(K)=| D(K)|^{1\over N}\). Let \(C\geq 1\) be a real number, and let \(G\) be a finite group. Let \({\mathcal K}(G,C)\) denote the collection of all Galois extensions with group isomorphic to \(G\) for which \(d(K)\leq C\). For example, let \(n\geq 1\) be an integer, and let \(\zeta_n\) denote a primitive \(n\)th root of unity. For a rational prime \(p\), \(d({\mathbb Q}(\zeta_p))=p^{p-2\over p-1}<p\), and so, \({\mathbb Q}(\zeta_p)\in {\mathcal K}(C_{p-1},p)\) where \(C_{p-1}\) denotes the cyclic group of order \(p-1\). A natural question arises: Can one compute all of the field extensions in \({\mathcal K}(C_{p-1},p)\)? This is a reasonable question since for a fixed group \(G\) and fixed constant \(C\geq 1\), it is known that \({\mathcal K}(G,C)\) is finite. In the case that \(C\) is Serre's constant \(\Omega\) (\(\approx 44.7632\)), the authors in the paper under review state the following conjecture: Conjecture 1.1: \({\mathcal K}(G,\Omega)\) is empty for all but a finite number of \(G\). The focus of the paper under review is to provide evidence in support of Conjecture 1.1. If Conjecture 1.1 is true, then \({\mathcal K}(\Omega)\) is finite, where \({\mathcal K}(\Omega)\) denotes the collection of all Galois extensions \(K/{\mathbb Q}\) with \(d(K)\leq \Omega\). Moreover, it is plausible that \({\mathcal K}(\Omega)\) is finite since \(\bigcup_G{\mathcal K}(G,C)\) is finite for \(C<\Omega\) if we assume the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis. In order to test Conjecture 1.1, the authors give a formula for computing root discriminants. One has \(\displaystyle{d(K)=\prod_p p^{\beta_p}}\), for rational numbers \(\beta_p\). Note that the \(\beta_p\) are zero almost everywhere. The computation of \(\beta_p\not = 0\) depends on whether \(p\) is tamely ramified or not. If \(p\) is tamely ramified, the method is to write \(K={\mathbb Q}(\alpha)\) for some \(\alpha\in {\mathbb C}\). Let \(f(x)\) be the irreducible polynomial of \(\alpha\), and let \(f(x)=r_1(x)r_2(x)\cdots r_g(x)\) denote the factorization of \(f(x)\) over \({\mathbb Q}_p^{un}\), the maximal unramified extension of \({\mathbb Q}_p\). If \(e_i=\text{deg}(r_i(x))\), \(i=1,\dots,g\), and \(t=\text{lcm}(e_1,e_2,\dots,e_g)\), then \(\beta_p={t-1\over t}\). In the case that \(p\) is wildly ramified, there is a corresponding formula (though more complicated) which computes \(\beta_p\) using the slope data at \(p\). With the formula for \(d(K)\) the authors, using the PARI/GP system and the Atlas of Finite Groups, compute \(| {\mathcal K}(G,\Omega)|\) for each \(G\) abelian. They show that there are \(7063\) abelian extensions in \({\mathcal K}(\Omega)\) (Proposition 3.1). This shows that \({\mathcal K}(G,\Omega)\) is empty for all but finitely many abelian groups, which verifies Conjecture 1.1 in the case that \(G\) is abelian. Their method uses the fact that each abelian extension is a subfield of \({\mathbb Q}^{ab}\), the maximal abelian extension of \({\mathbb Q}\) in \({\mathbb C}\), which in turn, is the union of the subfields \({\mathbb Q}(\zeta_n)\) by the Kronecker-Weber Theorem. In the case that \(G\) is non-abelian, the authors compute \(| {\mathcal K}(G,\Omega)|\) for various cases of \(G\), including the symmetric groups \(S_3,S_4,S_5,S_6\), the alternating groups \(A_4,A_5,A_6\) and the dihedral groups \(D_4,D_5\). For example, the authors show that \({\mathcal K}(A_6,\Omega)\) contains \(5\) fields, and that \({\mathcal K}(S_6,\Omega)\) contains \(13\) fields. For each of these fields, they give the value of the Galois root discriminant and the slope data, and find a defining polynomial for the field (Tables 5.2, 5.3).
    0 references
    Galois number fields
    0 references
    root discriminant
    0 references
    Serre constant
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references