Modeling expert judgements for Bayesian updating

DOI10.1214/aos/1176349664zbMath0609.62007OpenAlexW2043329862MaRDI QIDQ1086924

Mark J. Schervish, Christian Genest

Publication date: 1985

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176349664

zbMATH Keywords

consistency conditionconsensusBayes ruleproduct formulaexpert opinionsa posteriori probabilityopinion pool

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Related Items

SUPPORT FOR GEOMETRIC POOLING, A Framework for Multi-Model Ensembling, Stat trek. An interview with Christian Genest, A model of financial markets with endogenously correlated rational beliefs, Coherent combination of experts' opinions. (With discussion), Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, Quantifying Time-Varying Forecast Uncertainty and Risk for the Real Price of Oil, Bayesian model selection: application to the adjustment of fundamental physical constants, Multivariate Bayesian Predictive Synthesis in Macroeconomic Forecasting, Combining marginal probability distributions via minimization of weighted sum of Kullback-Leibler divergences, Dynamic Bayesian predictive synthesis in time series forecasting, Understanding pooled subjective probability estimates, Pooling operators with the marginalization property, Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging, All agreed: Aumann meets DeGroot, Fiducial inference in combining expert judgements, Calibrating expert assessments using hierarchical Gaussian process models, Subjective estimation of the delay time distribution in maintenance modelling, Bayesian forecast combination and Kalman filtering