The BLUPs are not best when it comes to bootstrapping

DOI10.1016/S0167-7152(02)00041-XzbMath0994.62035MaRDI QIDQ1613021

Jeffrey S. Morris

Publication date: 5 September 2002

Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

bootstrapmixed modelscorrelated datanested models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric statistical resampling methods (62G09)

Related Items (8)

Estimation of river and stream temperature trends under haphazard sampling ⋮ A semiparametric regression model for paired longitudinal outcomes with application in childhood blood pressure development ⋮ An assumption for the development of bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion in mixed models ⋮ Fast and Accurate Inference for the Smoothing Parameter in Semiparametric Models ⋮ What Level of Statistical Model Should We Use in Small Area Estimation? ⋮ Bootstrap estimation of uncertainty in prediction for generalized linear mixed models ⋮ Bootstrap variants of the Akaike information criterion for mixed model selection ⋮ Resampling Plans for Frailty Models

Uses Software

• bootstrap

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
• That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
• The derivation of blup, ML, REML estimation methods for generalised linear mixed models
• Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS

This page was built for publication: The BLUPs are not best when it comes to bootstrapping