To tender or not to tender? Deliberate and exogenous sunk costs in a public good game

DOI10.3390/G9030041zbMath1418.91133OpenAlexW2810565375WikidataQ129649268 ScholiaQ129649268MaRDI QIDQ1630447

Martin Sefton, Florian Heine

Publication date: 10 December 2018

Published in: Games (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/g9030041

zbMATH Keywords

experimentpublic goodcontestsunk costs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Public goods (91B18) Experimental studies (91A90)

Uses Software

• Z-Tree
• ORSEE
• hreg

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations
• Behavioral spillovers and cognitive load in multiple games: an experimental study
• Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: Coordination failure, game form auctions, and tacit communication
• The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games.
• Endowment inequality in public goods games: a re-examination
• Price competition between teams
• Competition lessens competition: an experimental investigation of simultaneous participation in a public good game and a lottery contest game with shared endowment
• Searching for the sunk cost fallacy
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
• Does Auctioning of Entry Licences Induce Collusion? An Experimental Study
• On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other

This page was built for publication: To tender or not to tender? Deliberate and exogenous sunk costs in a public good game